A forensic-intelligence platform for legal review.
WCI surfaces evidentiary and forensic reliability issues across a case and the actors involved in it, and produces structured analysis a legal team can act on.
One platform across the case lifecycle.
A platform, not a single tool.
WCI is a forensic-intelligence platform — a set of capabilities operating together across the case lifecycle. The same intelligence layer powers pretrial defense review and post-conviction analysis.
Structured where review has been manual.
Forensic and evidentiary reliability has historically been assessed case-by-case, reviewer-by-reviewer. WCI brings consistent, structured analysis to material that has long depended on who happened to be looking at it.
Built for legal review.
Every capability produces output a licensed attorney or qualified expert can interrogate, cite, and act on. WCI surfaces concerns; counsel and experts decide what they mean.
What the WCI platform does for a case.
Each capability is a distinct contribution to a single coherent read of the case. Together they form the WCI intelligence layer.
WCI Integrity Tracker
Continuous monitoring of public court records and the actors involved in a case — attorneys, forensic analysts, expert witnesses, investigators, and judicial officers.
Counsel sees the case in context: who is appearing, on what kinds of matters, and how the record around the participants is evolving over time.
Cross-case pattern analysis across these participants is in active development — see our roadmap.
Forensic reliability review
Assessment of the forensic evidence at issue in a case, surfaced as structured risk indicators tied to the specific disciplines and methods relied on.
When a conviction or charge turns on a forensic claim, the reliability of that claim is the case. Counsel needs an independent read on it before relying on it — or before challenging it.
Deep-dive case analysis
Structured examination of the full case record — charging materials, transcripts, expert findings, evidentiary documentation — produced as a reviewable analytical report.
Cases are dense. WCI's proprietary analysis returns a single coherent read of the record, so counsel and experts can focus their judgment on the issues that warrant it.
Evidentiary red-flag detection
Surfacing of forensic and evidentiary weak points across the case — questionable methodology, identification issues, chain-of-custody gaps, constitutional posture concerns — flagged for legal review.
The issues that overturn convictions and break prosecutions are often already in the record; they just have not been collected and named. This capability collects and names them.
A structured analytical report, built for legal review.
Every WCI matter produces a single structured report. It collects the platform’s findings on the case, organizes them by issue, and ties each finding to the underlying material in the record.
- Reliability assessment of the forensic evidence at issue, with risk indicators by discipline and method.
- Evidentiary red flags collected and named, with the record citations they attach to.
- Actor-pattern context for the participants in the case, where pattern-level visibility exists.
- A coherent analytical read of the full case record, organized for counsel and experts to interrogate.
WCI reports are analytical tools — not legal advice. Decisions about strategy, motions, and representation remain with a licensed attorney.
Current platform totals.
One intelligence layer, across the case lifecycle.
The same platform powers WCI Defend for active pretrial matters and WCI Review for post-conviction cases. When a Defend matter results in a conviction, the analytical record carries forward — post-conviction work begins from the existing record, not from scratch.
Bring a case to the platform.
Submissions are intaken through the secure WCI Portal and routed for review. No cost to submitters. Confidential intake.
Submit a case