A forensic-intelligence platform for legal review.
WCI surfaces evidentiary and forensic reliability issues across a case and the actors involved in it, and produces structured analysis a legal team can act on.
One platform across the case lifecycle.
A platform, not a single tool.
WCI is a forensic-intelligence platform — a set of capabilities operating together across the case lifecycle. The same intelligence layer powers pretrial defense review and post-conviction analysis.
Structured where review has been manual.
Forensic and evidentiary reliability has historically been assessed case-by-case, reviewer-by-reviewer. WCI brings consistent, structured analysis to material that has long depended on who happened to be looking at it.
Built for legal review.
Every capability produces output a licensed attorney or qualified expert can interrogate, cite, and act on. WCI surfaces concerns; counsel and experts decide what they mean.
What the WCI platform does for a case.
Each capability is a distinct contribution to a single coherent read of the case. Together they form the WCI intelligence layer.
WCI Integrity Tracker
Continuous monitoring of public court records and the actors involved in a case — attorneys, forensic analysts, expert witnesses, investigators, and judicial officers — with cross-case pattern surfacing when the same participants appear across matters.
Counsel sees the case in context: who is appearing, on what kinds of matters, how the public record around the participants is evolving, and where a participant's history across cases warrants a closer look.
Forensic reliability review
Assessment of the forensic evidence at issue in a case, surfaced as structured risk indicators tied to the specific disciplines and methods relied on.
When a conviction or charge turns on a forensic claim, the reliability of that claim is the case. Counsel needs an independent read on it before relying on it — or before challenging it.
Deep-dive case analysis
Structured examination of the complete case record — charging materials, transcripts, expert findings, evidentiary documentation — read in full with coverage tracked, and produced as a reviewable analytical report.
Cases are dense. WCI's proprietary analysis returns a single coherent read of the record, so counsel and experts can focus their judgment on the issues that warrant it.
Evidentiary red-flag detection
Surfacing of forensic and evidentiary weak points across the case — questionable methodology, identification issues, chain-of-custody gaps, constitutional posture concerns — flagged for legal review.
The issues that overturn convictions and break prosecutions are often already in the record; they just have not been collected and named. This capability collects and names them.
Forensic Intelligence Database
A maintained reference layer of forensic disciplines and methods with the scientific record on each — drawn from NAS, PCAST, and DOJ review material — that every WCI reliability assessment references.
Reliability findings rest on a shared, maintained foundation rather than ad-hoc lookups, so the same discipline is evaluated the same way in every case.
Case Theory Mapping
Organizes the platform's findings into candidate case theories for counsel review, with every theory tied to the specific findings and record material it rests on.
Counsel can see how the issues in a record connect — and what each theory does and does not rest on — without the platform drawing conclusions about the case itself.
Jurisdiction research aids
Per-jurisdiction procedural research across all fifty states and federal habeas, surfaced as clearly labeled unverified research aids alongside the case analysis.
Post-conviction and pretrial procedure varies by state. Research aids point counsel to where to look; verification and legal judgment remain with counsel.
A structured analytical report, built for legal review.
Every WCI matter produces a single structured report. It collects the platform’s findings on the case, organizes them by issue, and ties each finding to the underlying material in the record.
- Reliability assessment of the forensic evidence at issue, with risk indicators by discipline and method.
- Evidentiary red flags collected and named, with the record citations they attach to.
- Actor-pattern context for the participants in the case, and candidate case theories tied to the findings they rest on.
- A coherent analytical read of the full case record, organized for counsel and experts to interrogate.
WCI reports are analytical tools — not legal advice. Decisions about strategy, motions, and representation remain with a licensed attorney.
Current platform totals.
One intelligence layer, across the case lifecycle.
The same platform powers WCI Defend for active pretrial matters and WCI Review for post-conviction cases. When a Defend matter results in a conviction, the analytical record carries forward — post-conviction work begins from the existing record, not from scratch.
Bring a case to the platform.
Submissions are intaken through the secure WCI Portal and routed for review. No cost to submitters. Confidential intake.
Submit a case